Shayna
McHugh
February 2005
Democrat or Republican? Paper or plastic? Chocolate
or Vanilla? Angola or regional? The division between the two styles
of capoeira seems to be one of those great dichotomies. Unfortunately,
each camp holds a lot of misconceptions about the other. I don't
claim to be an expert, but as someone who doesn't fall completely
on either side of the fence, I have a few observations and opinions
to share.
To clarify
some definitions: when I say “capoeira angola” I refer
to all capoeira lineages (both Pastinha and non-Pastinha) that
date from before the creation of capoeira regional and do not
trace their line to Mestre Bimba. “Capoeira regional”
refers to both the original style created by Mestre Bimba and
students thereof (recognizing that this style is currently practiced
by very few groups today), AND the Senzala-based/contemporânea/atual
style that has come to be known generically today as capoeira
regional.
Angola
and Regional Stereotypes
Things
I've heard angoleiros say about regionalistas:
• They are not learning the “real,” “original”
capoeira
• Their style is a bastard child of capoeira angola devoid
of tradition and culturally, philosophically, and spiritually
bankrupt
• They are all about showing off their flashy moves, pretty
colored cords, and oversized muscles probably gained by the use
of steroids
• They spend all their time flipping, so they are ineffective
fighters.
Things I've heard regionalistas say about angoleiros:
• Their style is the low, slow, boring, old, musty and antiquated
version of capoeira
• They are cultish snobs with a superiority complex based
on practicing the “original” (and therefore more “legitimate”)
form of the art
• They are dirty, smelly hippies who do drugs far more often
than they shower
• Their style is a form of dance, so they are ineffective
fighters.
Not every angoleiro or regionalista thinks this way, of course,
but I’ve heard each of those thoughts voiced or hinted at
by students and even masters of the respective styles… more
times than I’d like. The stereotypes exist, even if they
are not always openly expressed.
I'll start by trying to separate the truth from the myth in the
above statements.
A
Closer Look at Capoeira Regional
No one denies that Mestre Bimba created capoeira regional in the
early 20th century. However, the fact that it is not the “original”
form of capoeira does not imply its inferiority. Capoeira angola
has evolved as well; to believe that the capoeira angola played
today is the same as the “original” form practiced
by African slaves in the 17th century, or even the form practiced
after the abolition of slavery in the late 19th century, is absurd.
All arts change slowly over the centuries; the creation of regional
was simply an unusually sudden – and deliberate –
change in capoeira, done by Mestre Bimba for the express purpose
of winning legitimacy for capoeira by promoting its acceptance
among the middle and upper classes.
It’s
true that Mestre Bimba sacrificed some traditions. Whereas capoeira
angola was a jogo (game) that included play, fight and everything
in between, Mestre Bimba emphasized the fighting aspect, marketing
his style as the Luta Regional da Bahia (Regional Fight [or Martial
Art] of Bahia) - the elimination of the word "capoeira"
from the title was done to help separate his version from the
negative stereotypes associated with that term. Bimba also shifted
the primary focus from malícia to technique/efficiency.
One result was the elimination of the chamadas, incorrectly seen
by regionalistas as moments of rest from the game when in actuality
they are sub-games designed to test the alertness and awaken the
malícia of the capoeiristas. Another consequence was the
de-emphasis of music: Bimba reduced the bateria from a gunga,
médio, viola, two pandeiros, atabaque, agogô, and
reco-reco to a single berimbau and two pandeiros. He replaced
the ladainhas and chulas sung in capoeira angola with the quadras,
four-liners that are not even used much anymore; most regional
rodas use only corridos. Mestre Bimba also introduced a few traditions:
the teaching of a capoeira “course” in an academy
setting and the creation of a graduation system and ceremony.
The deliberate
change of traditions in order to make capoeira appeal to a wider
audience may be questionable, but it definitely succeeded in its
aim of legitimizing the art: Mestre Bimba’s group worked
its way to a performance for President Getúlio Vargas,
which eventually led to the legalization of capoeira's practice.
It is impossible to say how capoeira would have evolved if Mestre
Bimba had not created regional, but it was undeniably a key step
in capoeira’s transformation from an undesirable pastime
of society’s “lowlifes” to a celebrated national
sport.
True capoeira
regional is not all style and no substance. Good regional groups
emphasize the functionality and purpose of movements, not just
how pretty they look. The seqüências of Mestre Bimba
were designed to teach players how to interact with each other
and use smart attacks, escapes, and counterattacks. During the
classes of Mestre Bamba (student of Mestre Vermelho 27, who was
a student of Bimba) that I took in Salvador, a big emphasis was
put on doing movements with purpose. I have never met a capoeira
regional instructor who believes acrobatics are equally or more
important than having a good game; instead, they encourage their
students to use floreios sparingly, wisely, and only in certain
moments: “the only time for acrobatics is when you enter
the roda, maybe if you have space you do a mortal or whatever,
but after you land, that’s it for the flips” (Professor
Ubaldo, Grupo Esporão).
I think some
angoleiros’ perception of regional as devoid of substance
comes from seeing regional performance rodas in which “one
guy kicks up in the sky and his opponent, ten feet away, hastily
dives to the floor to avoid the attack. Please! ...Don't get me
wrong, I'm sure it's a lot of fun as well, however, it does little
to develop your nervous system and finer reflexes for playing
against someone who will not agree with you beforehand to keep
there distance just to make you look good and feel safe”
(Contra-Mestre Pererê, “Gringos in the Ring”).
However, most regional groups have a very different character
in their performance rodas, which are geared towards creating
a beautiful, non-combative spectacle for the audience, versus
their training/academy rodas, in which the focus is interacting
with one’s partner and playing smart. The most extreme example
of this contrast I’ve seen was Capoeira Topázio in
Salvador: the capoeira they do as part of a folkloric performance
in the Solar de Unhão restaurant is pretty, playful, full
of flips and fancy movements, with less interaction between the
players; whereas their academy rodas are extremely intense and
competitive, with kicks, dodges and takedowns executed with ruthless
efficiency.
Sadly, I
have seen some regional/contemporânea groups that play with
little or no meaningful interaction all the time. I remember seeing
one angoleiro visit a regional group and play in their roda. The
two were not interacting well, and later on the regionalista told
the angoleiro, “You’re supposed to kick over me, not
right at me.” It brought to mind the words of Mestre Valmir
(angoleiro), who said, “If you do your kick over the other
player’s head, why should they dodge? All your movements
must have purpose.” Even in a playful game, one should kick
with objective… there is no meaningful interaction if you
aim to miss! But with the exceptions of these unfortunate groups,
many regionalistas do follow the principle “nunca dê
um golpe em vão” (never give a hit in vain) in their
academies.
A
Closer Look at Capoeira Angola
I hate responding
to this: “Oh, capoeira angola, that’s the slow, boring
version without the flips, right?” There’s so much
ignorance in that question I don’t know where to begin!
First of
all, capoeira angola is not “slow”; it is only seen
as such because it is played at a much wider variety of speeds
than regional. Capoeira regional is always played at medium to
fast paces, and the pace within each game remains pretty constant.
Angola rodas, on the other hand, can range from snail’s
pace to so-fast-your-mind-can-barely-process-it. Not only that,
but within each game slow and cautious movements are alternated
with extremely quick attacks and dodges. It makes it that much
more unpredictable, and that much more interesting to watch.
Speaking
of being interesting to watch, capoeira angola is far from “boring.”
Watching four-hour rodas on Saturday mornings at Mestre Valmir’s
academy was one of the most entertaining experiences I’ve
ever had. I was absolutely captivated by every moment of every
game; they all contained moments of laughter, joy, seriousness,
tension, playfulness, shame, aggression, revenge, anticipation,
and surprise. Capoeira angola may not catch one’s eye as
quickly as capoeira regional, but it is profoundly interesting
on a more complex level. Since the games are longer (about ten
minutes each as opposed to the sixty seconds of a regional game),
the players have time to really develop the interaction between
them, and it is mesmerizing.
Capoeira
angola can be an acquired taste. It can take some time to learn
to appreciate the style, especially for people who are used to
regional. Mestre Bola Sete put it well: “Modern capoeira
is similar to a young and beautiful woman that naturally rivets
whoever sees her, although she is completely empty in her essence.
Whereas the traditional capoeira of the past was more similar
to a simple woman of the people, who does not stand out at first
sight, but however possesses a truer beauty, interior, that only
the people with a more acute sensitivity could immediately perceive.”
There is
a very persistent myth among regionalistas that capoeira angola
is ineffective in a fight. First of all, just because an angoleiro
looks open and vulnerable doesn’t mean he is! I’ve
seen plenty of angoleiros who don’t appear particularly
intimidating, or who play with their bodies seemingly unprotected;
yet they are extremely capable of effective self-defense and vicious,
accurate attacks in fights or fight-like rodas. As Mestre Bola
Sete said in a lecture at the ABCA (Associação Brasileira
de Capoeira Angola), “capoeira angola is a violent fight;
it can kill; it has killed before” – and this is true.
However, the fight will not always be apparent when watching angoleiros
play because 1) Fight is one aspect among many of capoeira angola,
and one does not often see it – in fact, it should not occur
– between friends and training partners in the roda. Mestre
Bola Sete advises, “Do the game in the roda, and not the
fight, reserved for defense against our enemies,” and 2)
The fact that capoeira angola is a violent fight that does not
appear to be one only adds to its strength.
The efficiency
of any martial art depends on the experience level of the practitioner;
this applies to both capoeira angola and regional. Mestre Bola
Sete writes, “The hits of capoeira angola, almost always
executed with moderation in the roda, are very dangerous when
used in the street, against enemies, as long as the practitioner
possesses the necessary experience to utilize them in this circumstance;
if this is not the case, the situation is inverted (the danger
is to the practitioner).” I’ve seen both forms of
capoeira used well and used poorly in more aggressive, fight-like
games.
Finally,
the ad hominem attacks – the stereotypes of regionalistas
as shallow steroid addicts and angoleiros as dirty potheads –
are simply stereotypes that create divisions between capoeiristas
rather than bring them together. So why not drop them?
Conclusions
I agree with
Mestre Valmir, who once said to me in a conversation about angola
vs. regional, “Each style has its own value. Which one someone
practices depends on who they are and what they’re looking
for.” In other words, it’s not a matter of which one
is the “best” form of capoeira; it’s the question
of which one is the best for you.
Mestre Itabora
also gave some wise words during a workshop in Boston: “If
I teach a move differently than the way you’re used to doing
it, it doesn’t mean one way is right and the other is wrong…
they’re just different; try to learn from both.” If
certain capoeiristas focused less on the “superiority”
of their chosen style and instead tried to learn everything they
could from people who do things differently from them, we’d
have many more open-minded and well-rounded capoeiristas as well
as fewer problems between groups.
I’ll
close with a Mestre Bola Sete passage that really captures the
fact that capoeira’s diversity of styles is one of the sources
of its beauty and uniqueness:
Some
people in our midst have the custom of criticizing others’
playing styles, because they lift their legs very high or, by
contrast, because they don’t usually lift them above the
level of the waist, and other comments of this nature. If these
people reflected on this type of attitude without vanity, which
is unique to the human being of delayed evolution, they would
certainly arrive at the obvious conclusion of the poverty, in
terms of creativity, that there would be if all of us practiced
the same style; and that this condition of diversity is what gives
origin to the wealth of details present in rodas of capoeira,
where the ego of the capoeiristas manifests itself through their
bodies’ movements, demonstrating that to play capoeira is
a state of the spirit and that emotion is its essential component.